USGS RELEASES 2025 DRAFT LIST OF CRITICAL MINERALS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

2025-08-26T14:42:02+00:00August 26th, 2025|Customs, Freight Talk, Import, Industry Spotlight|

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), under the Department of the Interior, released an unpublished draft of the 2025 List of Critical Minerals, opening a public comment period thirty days after it is officially published in the Federal Register. The list identifies 54 minerals considered essential to U.S. economic and national security, reflecting changing supply concerns and strategic priorities.

WHY DID USGS ISSUE A NEW DRAFT LIST OF CRITICAL MINERALS?

Section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 requires the Secretary of the Interior to update the List of Critical Minerals every three years. The 2025 draft includes an extensive analysis of supply chain risk, economic impact, and national security considerations. It builds on previous lists issued in 2018 and 2022 and responds to new executive directives, including evaluations of uranium and metallurgical coal for potential inclusion.

RELATED READING: NEW SECTION 232 PROBE INTO CRITICAL MINERALS AND DERIVATIVES IMPORTS

WHICH MINERALS ARE INCLUDED IN THE 2025 DRAFT LIST?

The draft list comprises 54 minerals, ranging from aluminum, cobalt, and graphite to rare earth elements like neodymium and dysprosium. Many are produced as byproducts of other mining operations, such as gallium from bauxite and zinc or indium from zinc. Each was assessed for its essential role in defense, energy, technology, and industrial applications, as well as vulnerability to foreign supply disruptions.

2025 USGS Critical Minerals List

Mineral Commodity Produced as Byproduct Main Host Commodities
Aluminum No —
Antimony Yes Lead, gold, other base and precious metals
Barite No —
Beryllium No —
Bismuth Yes Lead, tungsten, copper, tin, molybdenum, fluorspar, zinc
Cerium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Cesium No —
Chromium No —
Cobalt Yes Nickel, copper
Copper No —
Dysprosium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Erbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Europium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Fluorspar No —
Gadolinium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Gallium Yes Bauxite and zinc
Germanium Yes Zinc and coal fly ash
Graphite (synthetic) Yes Needle coke (for synthetic graphite)
Hafnium Yes Zirconium
Holmium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Indium Yes Zinc
Iridium Yes Platinum, nickel
Lanthanum Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Lead No —
Lithium No —
Lutetium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Magnesium No —
Manganese No —
Neodymium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Nickel No —
Niobium No —
Palladium Yes Nickel, platinum
Platinum No —
Potash No —
Praseodymium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Rhenium Yes Molybdenum, copper
Rhodium Yes Nickel, platinum
Rubidium Yes Cesium, lithium
Ruthenium Yes Nickel, platinum
Samarium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Scandium Yes Cobalt, nickel, titanium, zirconium
Silicon No —
Silver Yes Zinc, lead, copper, gold
Tantalum No —
Terbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Thulium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Tin No —
Titanium No —
Tungsten No —
Vanadium Yes Steel slag from vanadiferous iron ore, spent catalysts
Ytterbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Yttrium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium)
Zinc No —
Zirconium Yes Titanium, tin
WHAT CRITERIA DETERMINE A CRITICAL MINERAL?

The Energy Act defines a critical mineral as one essential to the U.S. economy or national security, with a supply chain vulnerable to disruption, and without which the absence would have significant consequences. Excluded are fuel minerals, water, and common materials like sand and gravel. The USGS uses a peer-reviewed methodology that includes economic impact modeling, risk assessment, and host-byproduct analysis.

HOW DOES THIS IMPACT U.S. IMPORTERS AND MANUFACTURERS?

Importers and manufacturers that rely on critical minerals, particularly for aerospace, defense, electronics, and energy infrastructure, should review the draft list for exposure risks. Some materials, such as gallium, germanium, and rare earth magnets, face tightening export controls abroad, highlighting potential supply disruptions. Companies should monitor public comment deadlines, assess eligibility for exemptions, and consider diversifying or reshoring supply where feasible.

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS IN THE 2025 CRITICAL MINERALS REVIEW?

The USGS will accept written comments for 30 days after publication. Feedback may address the inclusion of specific minerals, the potential addition of uranium and metallurgical coal, or a move to more frequent updates. The final list may revise or expand the draft based on technical input and public comment. Submissions are accepted online through regulations.gov or by mail.

Stay up-to-date on freight news with Green’s Weekly Freight Market Update by following us on LinkedIn. For continuous updates, make sure to check out our website at greenworldwide.com.

share this information

Go to Top